...because I clearly don't understand what this woman was trying to convey.
Pennsylvania State Representative Babette Josephs went on a rant against the bill before the state legislators which, if enacted, would require women to undergo an ultrasound before proceeding with an abortion. The target of her ire was the women sponsoring this bill. Josephs is quoted as saying, "I do not understand how a woman in this Legislature can say to herself: 'I'm not capable of making my own health decisions... but I can get elected and make them for somebody else.' What is wrong with these women? What are they thinking about? Are they women? Or are they men with breasts."
Men with breasts? Huh?
I'm prolife, and that makes me a man? Representative Josephs: What were YOU thinking about?
Maybe you'll be able to explain it to me if you read the full story, which is available here. But in the meantime, let me go on record:
I'm prolife. Always.
I'm undecided as to the issue of mandated ultrasounds prior to abortion.
I have breasts, and I'm not a man. I checked.
I'm always surpised by people that do not want to take God's WORD into consideration...as the Standard by which we live and make our decisions! ♥♥♥
ReplyDeleteIt just goes to prove that some people do better when they have pre-written speeches...
ReplyDeleteCrazy.
ReplyDeleteIronically, women never learn anything about fetal development until it is a pregnancy they're keeping. When I first became pregnant I was amazed at everything I didn't know about human development. Every day I would check online, on what 'my baby' was doing that day.
ReplyDeleteI would rather see a state law mandating that middle school students in their health/sex-ed class witness an ultrasound on a pregnant woman, who would gladly volunteer her time and her uterus for educational purposes.